Monday, December 12, 2011

Unpacking Boardwalk Empire's Finale

Reader beware: this post does not reveal all spoilers from last night's episode, but it will contain a few for the sake of analysis and general "holy shit-ness".

Earlier, I reviewed Boardwalk Empire and said I did not like the show because it did not have a likeable character who was defined by the general idea of the hero. There was no one to pull for because each person had some duplicitous dark side that ruined his or her life. Also, they stayed stuck in their situation with no effort to leave (if they thought their situation was bad and needed leaving). I hate it when people play victim when they have the power to stop being victimized. Lastly, I did not like the show because of the actual production. It looked overly stylized in an effort to look authentic. Each scene was composed with deep gravitas, and the weight of the show created a heavy and unsettling effect.

I skipped two shows mid season and caught back up to see the last three. It was a great move because the last three addressed my last two complaints. They were wonderfully produced, acted, and the story progressed. Yes, finally, the payoff after two months of set ups. However, no character was developed to be the good center, the moral center, the hero, the righteous. The lack of moral center is both an indictment on the characters in the show, reflection of the culture (past and present), and a lament that maybe this is all that exists in this life.

The last few years in Hollywood, the best films have featured terrible villains, and those villains have afforded the actors that played them Oscar gold. Daniel Day Lewis, Javier Bardem, and Health Ledger come to mind. It is clear that we respond viscerally and empathically to the presence of evil. And when evil runs amuck on screen, taking it's action to their logical conclusion, we cringe, we gasp, we peer through our slightly opened fingers. I think this is similar to the reaction of watching horror films. We know it will be ugly, but we watch with disbelief anyways.

HBO harkens itself as not being TV. They want to provide high quality story telling equivalent to movies but through hour long dramas that run half the length of a regular television season. Each season acts like a mini-series of sorts. And each series is utterly predictable in its set up. AMC has jumped on this bad wagon, too.

The Sopranos, The Wire, Mad Men, Breaking Bad, and Boardwalk Empire all are critically acclaimed shows about fatally flawed individuals who cannot escape the bad that is around them or embraces the bad that is around them while trying to maintain a life of credibility to the world at large. Last night's Boardwalk Empire built up as the first and concluded as the last.

Bravo for the story tellers (writers, director) to lead us all to think one thing was happening while simultaneously hinting at another all together without us necessarily catching on. Then whammy, Jimmy gets shot in the head.

To recap the whole season and threads that leads to this moment would take tens of thousands of words, but rather I will focus on the statement that HBO and the story tellers are making with their choice to take Knucky Thompson back to the top through manipulation, lawlessness, deceit, and violence.

Thompson begged Margaret to mary him because he loved her and needed her to be immune from testifying. He turned over a new leaf. He told her he did not believe in God despite being raised a Catholic, but he said his love has to come from God because it could not necessarily come from anywhere else and he does not have to participate in the church's traditions for that to be true. It is unclear if he loves Margaret and her children because his marriage to her seemed to only benefit him legally and economically.

Jimmy calls Knucky to talk about the shooting at Knucky. Thompson goes and talks with Jimmy and appears to have moments of emotion like he has never had with "James". He is empathetic to Jimmy's life, his misfortunes, and what propelled to the path of corruption and destruction he was on. In return for his ear and his show of empathy and possibly forgiveness, Jimmy agrees to take care of some business for Knucky regarding his trial.

Everything falls into place for Knucky to be let off of trial through a murder disguised as a suicide, Margaret not being compelled to testify, and a plea bargain gone badly for the dopey former interim sheriff. Knucky got a new lease on life and with the opportunity to make things right with the people he once loved/was in business with (they are the same thing to Knucky and both are conditional), he orchestrated a meeting where he killed Jimmy proclaiming, "I am not interested in forgiveness."

Knucky's first murder was of his surrogate son. But as with Knucky, he has no emotion for anyone else, but only his own well being. He masks every interaction with concern for the other party involved, but only looks out for himself. Through the triumph of his character, all other forms of belief have been murdered through the self interest of man.

Boardwalk Empire no longer has the favorite character of many viewers. Jimmy was the favorite because he was young, handsome, and had some glimmer of hope. We believed he was a product of his bad life experiences, and he had an attempt to make it right after violently losing his wife and father and coming to grips with the sickening and manipulative relationship with his mother. That hope he gave was one that carried the show since it had not moral ground or center. It is a pluralistic show based on pluralistic ideas of what makes life worth living or rather makes life bearable to live. Snuffing out Jimmy confirms that the evil Knucky personifies is no longer feigned emotional concern or selfish ambition, it is outright unchecked evil.

In a way, Knucky became a sympathetic figure because he was taken down by traitors, both family and friends. He was just trying to make a buck and his callousness to others was a product of his own childhood. Now, Knucky no longer has justification. He is merely a two faced person who will manipulate and kill for his desire to be in control. Religion, moral code, family loyalty, friendship, or simply socially agreed upon virtues like forgiveness no longer hold any weight in his world.

I find it hard to continue to watch the show (I'll get the better part of a year to make a decision because of how much time between seasons HBO takes) because the loss of the good. I appreciate the story tellers' discussion of corruption, personal relationship, and delineations between what is good and bad. Yet, I long for someone to be a bastion of hope or good. Someone or something to believe in... not for me personally to believe in, but someone on the show to believe in that maybe these crazy messed up people won't continue to booze, kill, philander, and kill. In a certain way, HBO has killed the show. There is no possible positive arch. The characters will continue to devolve in a spiral of self inflicted misery.

We all love the stories of the mafia because it juxtaposes good and bad, the personal and the business, loyalty and disloyalty. But those are contingent on good actually existing or being possible to exist. These are tragedies because tragedies are not good. But I am not sure Boardwalk Empire is a tragedy in that sense. I think it is a lament that no one is good and anyone who is good will be seduced to be bad. They cannot avoid it or escape it. That is a difficult conclusion to come to. If that is life, then I, at least, do not want to watch a show about it.

I am not advocating we make all shows happy or positive. I am merely saying Boardwalk Empire made a fatal mistake in killing off a popular character. Also, I think this is a reflection of our society and the despondence many feel regarding relativistic thought and the lack of any sort of absolute reason for living. When we make our own reasons, they are often corrupt and unable to stay, in any way, good.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

The Sports Party: Episode 031

Today on the podcast, Dan and I discuss if the Big East moves make any difference to the fledgling conference. Next we discuss the Heisman candidates and pick our own Heisman winners.



Make sure you follow this link to join the Sports Party Bowl Game Challenge. The password is party2011.

Thanks for your continued support of the Sports Party. Here is the link to download the podcast from iTunes. Email us at thesportsparty@gmail.com.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

The Sports Party: Episode 030

First off follow this link to join the Sports Party Bowl Mania page and pick the winners of the bowl games. If you win there might be actual prizes, ACTUAL PRIZES! Alright now on to the podcast, first Dan, Mitch and I discuss the ACC Championship game. Next we stick with the ACC and discuss if Virginia Tech and Michigan deserve to be in the Sugar Bowl. We then try to decide if Alabama deserves to play in the National Championship. Enjoy the podcast.



Thanks for your continued support of the Sports Party. Here is the link to download the podcast from iTunes. Email us at thesportsparty@gmail.com.

Monday, December 5, 2011

In Defense of the Bowls

Division 1 Bowl Subdivision is the only division in any NCAA sport that does not determine their National Champion by a playoff. Many hate this. Many think that the way the sport is decided is unfair, biased to a region or institution, or simply inadequate. All these arguments are fair and have merit. However, I would like to spin another angle that may change the minds of those people who hate the bowl system.

From the dawn of college football... ok, so I don't know if it is that long ago, but from early CFB to now the sport has been incredibly popular. It was far more popular than any professional football until the 1970's. So the powers of the institutions and the powers of warm weather cities decided that the teams could match up in post season exhibitions that would not be seen elsewhere on conference and regional schedules.

It was a win-win-win. The cities got a unique matchup that brought dollars to their area. The insitutions got a lot of money for attending. The players got treated to vacations, the best lodging, media attention, and free goods and services. Further, it exposed them to new areas around the country and new media outlets where they could show off their talents. In short, the amateur players, for one week a year while not attending classes were treated like professional athletes.

That's exactly right. During the height of "amateurism" the powers that be decided it was completely acceptable for the collegiate football players to be treated as professionals. The bowl gift packages have to players have monetary limit, but the week does not. Hotels, resorts, tourism, free food, free clothes, free travel are all included.

Often, the BCS is eviscerated because the head of the BCS says the Bowl system is a reward for the players. The presidents of the universities have not voted for a playoff because it is widely understood that the bowls produce so much money for the schools that a playoff would take away that money from those who currently get it and place it in the hands of the NCAA.

Both are true and valid arguments. Yes, these players who work their asses off all year (some in the classroom, too), many who are not paid bags of cash like a recent Heisman Trophy winner, get a chance to live a life of ease at the end of their year. In fact, these players don't belong to major college football programs either. How many times have we looked at lesser tier bowls and the teams playing in them and think, "wow, this bowl is terrible" or "holy crap, why are these teams in a bowl game?... and why is it played in Shreveport, St Petersburg, or El Paso?"

Because the money is so great. Presidents of big time colleges take a gamble and pump money into programs in hopes of big TV dollars and big bowl payouts. Small time programs most likely lose money, but because of the bowl system they can get an influx of cash at the end of the year, it's pooled and shared among conference members, and then given to universities.

I am not arguing that the BCS is not a flawed system. Nor am I arguing that these programs make an incredible amount of money on 18-22 year olds in a system that has no market competitor. But I am saying that the Bowl system allows football players, many who will never ever sniff the NFL, a chance to be rewarded through gifts and cash equivalents.

Yes, the BCS is bad. The system before it was worse. But a playoff would very likely undermine a system that allows for what we call for all the time: college football players to receive compensation.


Sunday, December 4, 2011

The Thrill of the Hunt:

UNC's Search for a New Head Coach
Throughout the past two football seasons, the NCAA probe into the UNC football program has left the university in an awkward position with an unusual set of circumstances. Not since Lawrence Taylor, has UNC’s legitimacy come under such scrutiny. From the playing fields to the classroom, UNC has always been viewed as a top-tier school even by the highest standards. People in the UNC family were immediately baffled by the allegations of misconduct by the University’s Athletic Department. While outsiders may throw ignorant suggestions about the quality of management in the UNC tradition by grasping at unfamiliar straws, the University is quietly handling any ill-advised student-athlete transactions with precaution to disguise the scandal as what it is: uniquely isolated. While the administration deals with remedying the scandal, the ‘mismanaged’ athletic department looks forward to another basketball season atop many lists to win another national championship, while the football program continues to heal.
The UNC football season began in a depressive manner; with 3 weeks left in the preseason, UNC was in the process of appointing Everett Withers to lead the football team just hours after showing Butch Davis the door. Altogether, the football team put together a successful season with a (5-1) start and a +.500 record to regain bowl eligibility in what could have been ‘the most broken season’ for UNC athletics. This positive rebound from the fall-out that began in July 2010 most surely earned Everett Withers an interview for the Head Coaching job left vacant by Davis in the preseason. It cannot be overemphasized how well Withers handled the situation in which he was presented. His success was positively viewed by the revamped UNC Athletic Department and Coach Withers has most deservedly been nominated as a candidate for the unclaimed Head Coaching position. So, what competition does he face for the job?
Thanks to the constant monitoring of insidecarolina.com, as well as several other sources, the list of candidates that follow represent the pool of nominees UNC is interviewing for the HC position: Everett Withers, Larry Fedora, Butch Jones, James Franklin, Kevin Sumlin, and Gus Malzahn. Per insidecarolina.com, because Urban Meyer is the new hire at Ohio State, hesitation for Skip Holtz’s inclusion in the list of candidates, and Chris Petersen’s romantic affinity for Idaho, these three coaches, who were at one time considered to be potential candidates, are all off the board. Did you really think Urban Meyer would give up UF dominance established by himself for a 3-star project like UNC football? So, other than Meyer, which of these candidates is the best option to take control of the UNC football program?

Let’s break these guys down based on what they could bring to UNC football and what they might be lacking.

Everett Withers
Pros:
-He has worked as a defensive coach on the professional and collegiate level.
-From 2002-2004, as the Tennessee Titans’ DB coach, Withers gained notoriety by leading the Titans defense to 57 interceptions over 3 seasons (the most interceptions by a team in a three year span since 1993-1995).
- In 2009, Withers turned the UNC defense into a powerhouse defense in the NCAA
-2009 UNC defense: 6th in total defense, 13th in scoring defense, 10th in run defense, 14th in pass defense.
-The only school in the country ranking in the top-15 in total yards allowed, scoring defense, run defense, pass defense, third-down defense, tackles for loss, and pass efficiency.
-(7-5) record with the Tarheels in his year as interim head coach.
Cons:
- Everett Withers has had little experience in the role as head coach and although he managed the pressure this season in an outstanding way, UNC is looking for a coach that has a record of success.
-Butch Davis left an impact on UNC football that has fans expecting the program to keep improving.
-Davis made 4 and 5-star prospects a normalcy at UNC. Since his departure, Withers has struggled on the recruiting trail and talent has dropped off over the year from potential 5 stars to a majority of 3 star athletes.
-Mediocrity is not what Bubba Cunningham is looking for in his first hire as the new AD.
-The most crucial element that Withers is unable to avoid is his tie to the Davis era scandal.
-UNC has to make a decision to bury this blemish on the University and a Head Coach tenured through the scandal doesn’t help separating the university from the past.
-(3-5) conference record falling to the bottom of the ACC Coastal Division
Decision: Withers isn’t our guy. UNC is looking to make a splash with whom they bring in to take the reigns of a growing football program. There is money in the boosters club dedicated to bringing in a proven success
and, while Withers did a fantastic job leading the football team through a tough year, his credentials don’t yell improvement, and the university and he share too much history associated with the Butch Davis fallout. Nonetheless, we wish him a future full of success. Thank you, Coach Withers.

Kevin Sumlin
Pros:
-Sumlin has had concrete success as a Division 1 NCAA head coach.
-Since taking over at Houston in 2008, Sumlin has accrued a (35-17) record and, in 2011, led Houston to an undefeated regular season and a potential BCS bowl berth (Note: After losing to Southern Miss. on Sat. Dec. 3, Sumlin's Cougar's came just shy of a (13-0 record) and Conference USA championship, thus forfeiting a shot at a BCS bowl berth.).
-Brought Houston into the Top-25 in week 7 and remained there throughout the season reaching 6th overall at the end of the regular season.
-Has had success in recruiting and offense
- The Cougar offense has topped 40 points in 22 of 39 game (56.4%), reached 50 points nine times and scored over 70 points twice.
- Receiving the OC job midseason at Texas A&M, Sumlin took the offense from 16 ppg to 33 ppg, immediately.
-Ties to Bubba Cunningham
- Fits the mold of what Cunningham wants for the new HC with a highlighted offense.
- Coached against and beat Cunningham’s former school, Tulsa, on every occasion Cunningham was there.
Cons:
-His newfound success has him high on coaching lists around the country.
-As the new Athletic Director, Cunningham should be hasty on making the right decision regarding a new head coach. Sumlin’s success will put him in the driver’s seat for head coaching opportunities next year, and that could mean UNC would be waiting a long time in a Sumlin-or-bust pursuit. With that said, Sumlin could be off the board earlier rather than later. Arizona State has already offered Sumlin their head-coaching job, and with his recent success, other schools are likely to pull the same trigger soon.
-BCS success
-Though Sumlin has had an outstanding record at Houston, you always have to be slightly skeptical when pulling a coach up from the lower-than-BCS ranks. The ACC is no football powerhouse, but the competition will stiffen up on a week-to-week basis. There’s a reason they haven’t let Boise play for a championship yet.

Decision: Coach Sumlin would be the hire that would define the beginning of Bubba Cunningham’s tenure at UNC and reignite the fading flame of optimism in the Tarheel faithful. It’s an all around improvement in both X’s/O’s strategy and the recruiting weakness of Withers. Additionally, the Tarheels stout young offense coming back next year could be appropriate tools for Sumlin to work with. There’s no realistic projection of how Sumlin would contend in a BCS conference, but there’s no reason to believe he doesn’t deserve the shot.

Gus Malzahn
Pros:
-Offensive mastermind
- Gained recognition through redeveloping and re-popularizing the Wildcat formation, which he has used as the OC at Arkansas, Tulsa, and Auburn.
-Malzahn has created an effective offensive style, which operates as a no-huddle spread-oriented run first and pass attack.
-Success as an offensive coordinator
-While at Auburn, Malzahn ran one of the most proficient SEC offenses to the effect of a national championship title
-His offenses in 2007 and 2008 ranked first nationally in total offense
-2010 Frank Broyles Award recipient, top assistant coach in the country.
-Great Recruiter
Cons:
-Inexperience
-Just 6 years removed from being an Arkansas high school head coach, Malzahn has quickly worked his way up the ranks from an offensive coordinating novelty to a commodity as head coach. Only thing is, he’s yet to coach a game on the collegiate level as an HC.
-Character Flaws
-‘Flaws’ is a little too harsh. Malzahn has an unusual personality, but that’s not worth noting. His wife however has shown up in the media from time to time and rumors about her personal behavior seem to follow the pair.

Decision: UNC’s current offensive style may not be the perfect fit for Malzahn to work with, but he is completely capable of re-engineering and transforming the UNC football program into a successful ACC program. This does seem to be the perfect hire for Cunningham now that Petersen in falling on the list. Malzahn’s name would bring a Petersen-style splash. His reputation as an offensive ‘genius’ would bring the same optimism about the program that the Butch Davis hire had—perhaps more. Carolina may not have the exact personnel Malzahn would want, but they have nearly all the pieces for him to work with. While this is my personal favorite for the position, I hate the idea of watching UNC’s defense play second-fiddle to a non-Pro style offense. Malzahn should be at the top of Cunningham’s list

Conclusion
Everett Withers and Gus Malzahn met with Bubba Cunningham Nov. 29 and Dec. 1 respectivel to interview for the Head Coaching position. In the upcoming week, Kevin Sumlin, along with Southern Mississippi Head Coach Larry Fedora, Vanderbilt Head Coach James Franklin, USF Head Coach Skip Holtz, and Cincinnati Head Coach Butch Jones, will interview for the position, as well. At the present time, Malzahn and Sumlin top the list for apparent reasons—Everett Withers stands in the second tier, due his own consideration—Fedora, Jones, and Franklin round out the list, with Holtz status wavering as a potential hire. Cunningham has officially stated that UNC will know their new Head Coach by UNC’s bowl game, which is projected to either be the Independence Bowl on Dec. 26 or the Military Bowl on Dec. 28. Either way, UNC fans should have an idea of the direction the program is heading by Christmas.


UPDATE: As of Dec. 5, UNC has officially offered USM head coach Larry Fedora the head coaching position at UNC. Through 4 season in Hattiesburg, Fedora is (33-19). He is expected to accept the position Tuesday Dec. 6.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Let's Blow Some Money (Working Title)

Everyone likes to gamble, whether it's paying five dollars to get in a March Madness bracket pool, playing poker for quarters and dimes in a friend's basement or actually going to Vegas. My favorite way to gamble is on sports. It's a subject I feel pretty confident in so why not put my (very little) money, where my mouth is. Every Friday I am going to bring you the best betting lines from the weekend and what I think you should do. I am not going to do cheesy locks of the weeks or anything like that, I am just bring you solid games to bet on.

The team in bold is who you should bet on.

Friday

NCAAB

Florida Gators
Syracuse Orange (-6)

There are two key factors in taking the Orange to beat the spread this weekend, one, they are playing this game at home and two, the zone play of Syracuse. The Florida Gators come into this season kind of a question mark to me and outside of their early game against Ohio State the level of competition has been low. Syracuse hasn't played anyone to the level of talent of Ohio State but I think we know what we are getting out of Syracuse with so many returning players and Jim Boeheim's commitment to the zone. From what I have seen from Syracuse so far I am confident they will beat the spread. 

NCAAF

Oregon Ducks
UCLA Bruins (+31)

If you are new to gambling I am going to explain something to you right here. That (+31) means that Oregon is picked to beat UCLA by 31 points right now. If you think that it will be less than that and you would take UCLA at (+31). If you think Oregon beats UCLA by more than 31 points you take Oregon at (-31). That's a pretty easy way of explaining that. In this game I am going to take UCLA to cover the spread and not get beat by more than 31 points. I know Oregon is the better team, they are playing at home and a win gives them a BCS bowl bid and they will win this game. But I expect UCLA to show up at this game with some passion and not get blown out by the Ducks. The head coach, Rick Neuheisel, was fired earlier this week and his players carried him off the practice field in their last practice before traveling up to Eugene. I expect this team to show up for their coach and for the opportunity of playing in the first ever Pac12 Championship game. The Bruins will cover the spread.

Sunday

NFL

Buffalo Bills (-3)
Tennessee Titans

Buffalo has been on a four game slid but last week showed up and played the New York Jets well but ultimately lost 28-24. The Titans have gone win, loss, win, loss, win over their last five games and I would expect another loss this weekend despite the Bills five game losing streak. In the two loses the Titans have lost by 13 total points. They keep games close but I expect Buffalo to get the win this weekend and cover the three points. 

Atlanta Falcons (-3)
Houston Texans

The Houston Texans are riding high on a five game winning streak but everything is not so great down in Houston. Two weeks ago they lost their starting quarterback, Matt Schaub, to a foot injury. Last weekend they lost their backup quarterback, Matt Leinart, to a shoulder injury and both Schaub and Leinart are out for the season. So the team now turns to their third-string, rookie quarterback T.J. Yates. The Texans do have a solid running game and a good defense but the Falcons will be able to drop eight guys in the box and force Yates to beat them. I don't expect that to happen. The Falcons also have a good running game and I would expect rookie mistakes by Yates to ultimately help the Falcons break this game open. I do not expect this to be close. Take the Falcons. 

Thursday, December 1, 2011

The Sports Party: Episode 029

Today on the Sports Party podcast, first I announce our first ever contest between us at the Sports Party and you. Listen and then follow the directions found here. Next Dan comes on and we discuss the ACC Championship game between Virginia Tech and Clemson. Also, we discuss Tim Tebow and his early career in the NFL. Lastly, we come back to the ACC Championship game and give our predictions. Enjoy the podcast.



Thanks for your continued support of the Sports Party. Here is the link to download the podcast from iTunes. Email us at thesportsparty@gmail.com.

Wednesday, November 30, 2011

Play Against The Sports Party in College Bowl Mania

Here at the Sports Party we put out a lot of predictions and most of them are wrong. I'm sure when you read or hear these you think "Hey! I can do this much better than they can!" Well here is your chance. We are going to pick the winner of each bowl game and give you the opportunity to do the same. If you win the contest, there will be "prizes", though I cannot commit to how great these prizes will be. The prizes may or may not include leftover Christmas gift cards and your chance to come on the podcast and talk about whatever topic you would like.

Here's what you have to do. Go to ESPN.com, sign up for a free account there (though I would assume anyone who visits this site, probably has an ESPN account), and then click this link. This should directly to our page on ESPN.com. Our group name is The Sports Party. The password is party2011. You have to select straight scoring NOT confidence scoring. Sign up and make sure to come back after the bowl games are set and pick your winners. Good luck everyone!!

The Bowl Game Match-ups We Want But Cannot Have

Bowl season is one of the most exciting times of the year, we get to see teams play that don't normally play each other and it all builds up to the National Championship game and the crowning of the number one team in college football. Every year we seem to get a few dream match-ups and so this season I decided to pick a few of my dream match-ups for this bowl season. Each of these games would either be a lot of fun to watch or have great story lines. The problem is none of these will likely happen but if they did we, as fans, would have a blast.


Baylor-Michigan (The Quarterback Bowl)
Two of the most exciting quarterbacks in the country in one game? Yes please. Whether it is through the air or on the ground, Robert Griffin III of Baylor and Denard Robinson of Michigan, make big, exciting plays. Just look at the offense these two players have accumulated. Griffin has 3768 passing yards with a 72.6 percent completion record for 34 touchdowns to just five interceptions. On the ground, Griffin has 612 yards on 149 carries for an average of 4.1 yards per carry and seven touchdowns. Robinson caused more damage on the ground, rushing for 1163 yards on 208 carries for an average of 5.6 yards per carry and 18 touchdowns. His passing numbers weren't as great as Griffin's though as he threw for 2056 yards with a 56.1% completion record with 18 touchdowns to 14 interceptions. Griffin has amassed 4290 yards and Robinson 3219. By himself, Griffin rank as the 86th best offense in the country based on total yards. Go back and watch Griffin's game against Oklahoma and Robinson's game against Ohio State this past weekend and you can see why having these two players on the same field would be so much fun. Neither team has much of a defense to speak of so scoring could up in the 50's with both of these quarterbacks orchestrating a dream of a game.


LSU-Stanford (Honey Badger vs. Luck Bowl)
Andrew Luck came into this season as the Heisman front runner and the favorite to be the number one draft pick in next April's NFL Draft. Actually, he would have been the first draft pick in the 2011 NFL draft as well. Since the beginning of the season another player has captured the hearts and minds of the American public, Tyrann Mathieu. Oh but you don't know him by that name you know him as the "Honey Badger". There hasn't been a player this season that has been more exciting than the Honey Badger. He just makes big plays. This season he has forced six fumbles, had four fumble recoveries and returned two of those for touchdowns, had a punt return for a touchdown, two interceptions, and 66 total tackles. His name is on the Heisman list and he has had one heck of a season. Now this wouldn't really be Luck vs. the Honey Badger as both the Stanford offense and the LSU defense are more than one player, but those are the stars. Stanford's offense comes in ranked 5th in scoring offense and LSU's defense is ranked 2nd in scoring defense. This isn't David vs. Goliath, this is Goliath vs. Goliath.


Florida State-Texas A&M (Disappointment Bowl)
Both of these teams started the season in Top 10 of the AP poll, Florida State at 6th and Texas A&M at 8th. In the latest AP poll, of the two teams only Florida State was ranked and that was at 25th. Combined these teams are 14-10 and neither will be playing for their Conference Championships this weekend, much less a National Championship, which some of the media predicted for these teams. This was supposed to be big years for both teams even without their top 10 rankings. Florida State was supposed to be back and build on their 10-4 record from last year, where they played in the ACC Championship game and beat South Carolina in the Chick-fil-A bowl. But they regressed and now the alumni and fans are getting frustrated with Jimbo Fisher, just 12 months after believing he was the second coming. For Texas A&M, this was their last year in the Big12 before their exit to the SEC. They wanted to make the case they belonged in the SEC by dominating the Big12 in their final season, but instead they were dominated. They only beat one ranked opponent this season, Baylor, and their final game in the Big12 was a huge disappointment in one more, possibly final, lose to Texas at home. This bowl game would be good for at least one of the programs to say, at least we didn't fall as far as those guys.


Ohio State-Florida (Urban Bowl)
When coaches are winning you hear a lot of great stories about them, except for Nick Saban I never hear anything nice about Nick Saban. One coach we have heard a lot about over past five years is Urban Meyer but over the last week we have learned one thing about Urban Meyer, he's just like a lot of other coaches, in that you can't always trust them. In his relatively short career Meyer already has two National Championships. But the end of his career at Florida ended oddly, with Meyer citing health issues and wanting to spend more time with his family as the reasons for leaving. Just a short time later, Meyer takes a job at ESPN, which had him traveling almost as much as a head coaching job would. Less than one year later, Meyer has taken the Ohio State job and the Florida fan base, players and coaches are not happy about it. Meyer won't be coaching in whatever bowl game Ohio State plays in but this would be a great opportunity for the Florida players to prove that Meyer made a mistake in leaving Gainseville. It has been a rough year for both programs but this game could fire up both teams enough to finish the season strong.


Oklahoma State-Oregon (Take the Over on the Over/Under Bowl)
Points on points on points! If you hate defense, then this is the game you want to see. Oklahoma State is ranked 2nd in scoring offense and Oregon ranks 3rd. Both teams are averaging over 45 points a game and the game would have star power on both teams, LaMichael James and Darron Thomas for Oregon and Brandon Weeden and Justin Blackmon for Oklahoma State. I haven't checked bowl projections but if Oklahoma State loses to Oklahoma this weekend and in turn loses the Big12 BCS bid, this match-up feels like it could happen. If it does, expect it to be one of the most exciting games of the bowl season.



Honorable Mentions:
Wisconsin-NC State: This game would not be close but it would be fun to see Russell Wilson get some revenge on NC State or see if Mike Glennon can prove that Tom O'Brien made the right choice.

USC-Miami: Neither of these teams will play in bowls this off-season because of NCAA investigations. USC has already been found guilty by the NCAA and is in the second season of their two-year bowl game ban. Miami is currently under investigation and is holding themselves out of a bowl game preemptively. This would be a good opportunity for Miami coaches and players to get some advice from USC on what it's like to spend a few seasons under punishment.

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

The Sports Party: Episode 028

Pat comes on and we discuss some college basketball. First up we discuss the Duke-Kansas Championship game in the Maui Invitational and then discuss the Syracuse-Stanford Championship game in the NIT Season Tip-Off. After the break, we look at the three biggest games in the ACC/Big10 Challenge and make predictions for those games. Below the podcast you will see our picks for the other nine games. Those picks can also be found here on our predictions page.



Here's the links to Pat's articles I mentioned. Here for the one on why UNC won't win the National Championship in basketball this season and here is the link for an article on some Rookie quarterbacks in the NFL.

Chris                                                           Pat
Purdue over Miami                                      Purdue over Miami
Georgia Tech over Northwestern                   Northwestern over Georgia Tech
Maryland over Illinois                                   Illinois over Maryland
Michigan over UVA                                      UVA over Michigan
Iowa over Clemson                                      Clemson over Iowa
NC State over Indiana                                  NC State over Indiania
Penn State over Boston College                   Penn State over Boston College
Virginia Tech over Minnesota                       Virginia Tech over Minnesota
Wake Forest over Nebraska                        Nebraska over Wake Forest

Saturday, November 26, 2011

The State of Play (Vol. 1): 'Why UNC will NOT win the 2012 NCAA Championship'

Written by: Devil's Advocate

Here we are. Basketball season is a couple weeks underway and though the landscape in April will be vastly different from the landscape we have now, several are indicating two teams are the head and shoulders favorites to make their way through the NCAA this season: UNC and Kentucky. With a match-up between the two coming up in a couple of weeks in Rupp Arena, we are left to ask ourselves this hypothetical question: If these two teams prove to be the best two teams at the end of the year, who takes the crown in New Orleans? Past history would suggest the Tarheels are extremely able to win a National Title in the state of Louisiana; they’ve won 2 of their 5 NCAA tournaments in the Superdome. But if Kentucky stands in their way in a National Championship setting, I believe history will be challenged.

The Tarheels have 10 players on their roster this year that could start for many teams around the country and will ultimately contribute, each in their independent way, to the Tarheels success this season. That’s 2 full teams! The last time they were this deep was 2009 and that year they unloaded a mass of fury against the field of 65, winning the NCAA championship by 20 points per game. Not only are they similar to the 2009 team in depth, they have some of the best talent throughout the country at each individual position. Harrison Barnes has athletic ability that could rival that of Michael Jordan; Kendall Marshall delivers a pass almost as elegantly as Jason Kidd; and the length of John Henson helps him to have a shot-blocking ability that resembles something of an overly thin collegiate Shaquille O’Neal. So, what’s the problem with that?

Mostly inexperience. But even that won’t be the Achilles ‘Heel’ this season. If there are two coaches in the league that have the coaching ability to expose his players’ talents in the small window of 1 season, those guys are Roy Williams and John Calipari. Perhaps, Calipari more than Williams only because the majority of his teams have been mosaics of the best freshmen in the country. It’s what he does: take in fresh young talent, get the most out of their ability in just a single season, and turn them loose on the NBA Draft. Roy Williams is usually a little luckier and this year is no exception. Williams has the luxury of harnessing talent and bringing the best of those talents to the surface over a longer period of time, as many of his players prefer to see their junior year, at least. But, if you remember Harrison Barnes and Kendall Marshall last year as well as Tyler Hansbrough, Ed Davis, and Brandan Wright of previous years, Williams is able to do the same thing as Calipari in the same amount of time. But, Roy doesn’t need to worry about that too much this year. Other than the inevitable assistance at the three-point line from freshman P.J. Hairston, the majority of Williams’ talent comes from his returning all-stars.

But, lets be fair. It’s true that the Tarheels have a wealth of talent, however their skill set may only be outmatched by Kentucky. Though the Wildcats may not be as deep, they have 6 or 7 players that they can go to, 5 of which are future NBA first rounders. The interesting thing that this Kentucky team has that most Calipari teams don’t is two really talented and dominant sophmores; Terrance Jones and Doron Lamb have done this with Calipari before, and the last time they did this, they were one game away from facing 1-of-2 cupcake mid-majors for the championship. (I’m only stressing their ineptness as teams within a conference because the majority of people who read this actually thought the national champion could come from that side of the bracket last year) This year, Calipari will be much more contentious for something that he was already just outside the hunt for last season. The only difference from his usual freshman dominated teams comes from the small amount of experience the two sophomores possess that should propel the Wildcats into a national championship game. And, though I really don’t mean to oversell the talent Kentucky has, I have to suggest that there has yet to be a player as dominant as Terrence Jones on a Calipari team, other than Derrick Rose. He’s aggressive, imposing, and relentless. Thing that, I feel, will be the general theme in a neutral-court scenario between the ‘Cats and the ‘Heels.

So, the coaching is there along with the talent. This is all too obvious. As well, it is all too obvious why everyone is jumping on these two bandwagons for a championship. So, who wins the hypothetical game in New Orleans? Well, the early season game between the two should be an indicator of what will be if this happened down the road. Both of these teams are sure to be much better in the months of March and April than they will in December. However, on a neutral court setting, though the Heels can win a game of endurance, the physical play of the Tarheels will lead to their ultimate downfall. There are two schemes by which this game will ultimately be played: either face paced or half-court. Kentucky will have the speed to run with the Heels, who are known for their Williams run-and-gun style. Also, Calipari doesn’t seem like the person to back down from a challenge to let his guys run with UNC. But they won’t win that way. Terrence Jones is a big, dominating presence, but in an open-court track meet, my edge goes to the Heels. Tyler Zeller’s uncanny ability to beat opposing guards to the other end of the court, along with the other 4’s baptism into the style over the past 2 season AND the second string of all-stars will give them the edge in a 60-minute endurance test.

No, this game will be played in the half-court. And rightfully so. My perception of the Tarheels comes up a little short when comparing their defensive ability to that of 2009. Roy Williams’ fast paced style is extremely effective, but it needs defensive takeaways to feed it. And (though he had 6 steals in the game against South Carolina, proving he has developed somewhat defensively over the off-season) I don’t think Kendall Marshall will be going for 8 steals in the national championship game the way Ty Lawson did against Michigan St. Nor do I think Kentucky’s talented young guys will be as willing to turn the ball over. Therefore, this game must be played inside 45 feet.

So what? Why cant UNC,… with 10 deep, the most outstanding front court in the country, and the increasing ability to shoot the three that you’ll see as the year progresses,… why cant they beat Kentucky in the halfcourt? It’s simply: physicality. Just look at the size of Zeller and Henson compared to Terrance Jones. He uses his body to make the big play. UNC’s big bodies are pretty small other than James McAdoo, who could, I’ll grant you, potentially influence the outcome of this match-up. But that isn’t why the physicality will be the issue; as I said, the Tarheels will have talent on the inside and out to be able to score. No, no, no, it isn’t about scoring. Actually it has more to do with who controls the game.

Both of these teams will be at their best on April 3rd of the coming year, if they truly are to meet. And even though Williams can go 10 deep, you can only have 5 on the court at one time….

…Aye, there’s the rub. It would be more beneficial all around if the Heels were able to run like they’d want, but with 5 on 5 in the halfcourt, the Tarheels will definitely be out-matched from a talent perspective, as long as Calipari can put 5 desirable guys on the floor. The only way the Heels or anyone playing the Wildcats late in the season will be able to expose the weakness Kentucky has in their youth is to dominate the Cats to a point where the team sinks back into their freshman selves.

That’s it. That’s all I’m saying. A matured Kentucky offense will only lose games if they are intimidated by an opposing team. Intimidated to the point that they relapse into their comfortable style of play, which ultimately leads to dysfunction and disorganization associated with freshman play on the collegiate level.

Maybe a final four match-up with Connecticut or Ohio State could expose this weakness, but for this edition of The State of Play we’re talking UNC-UK final game (Which, if you've ever watched an NCAA tournament, you understand, regardless who the two best teams are, facing each other in the end is highly improbable). With that, the Tarheels are simply too passive. Throughout the year, Roy Williams will focus much more time on the usefulness of the outlet pass, rather than physical dominance. And rightfully so, this team can be extremely successful using that strategy. But, against the more superior 5-on-5 talent Kentucky possesses, along with the size of Terrence Jones, the Tarheels will be outmatched physically against a team that will exert their will in a neutral court scenario.

No, my guess is this UNC team’s path through the NCAA tournament will resemble UNC’s 2008 run. They’ll fall short if they are to play the Wildcats in April. And, if there’s a God, the NBA will be locked-out next year and Barnes and Henson will come back to help cut down the nets next season (Note: The NBA has developed a tentative agreement between the writing of this article and it's posting; there's still no assurance that there will be a 'next season' in the NBA, however). But, I guess we’ll just have to see…

Wednesday, November 23, 2011

The Most Successful, The Most Valuable, and The Dark Horse: (Read Again in Five Years)

“Who is the best quarterback from the NFL draft?” It’s a question that plagues the minds of professional football fans from the preparation for the NFL draft until the next year’s Superbowl. And then, seldom to be contemplated unless, retrospectively, a goldmine of talent is exposed years later through a comment like, “Did you know Tom Brady was drafted 199th overall, after 6 other quarterbacks were drafted, including Chad Pennington?” Or, “Who do you think lucked out from Eli Manning’s ‘hissy-fit’ to get out of going to San Diego (dude, it’s San Diego!) in 2004? Chargers or Giants?”

So far, it’s mid-season in the NFL. Six games remain, and the question is valid for another 3 months, only to be thrown into the obsoleted abyss, by the next year’s draft class. Without further ado, “Which quarterback from the 2011 NFL Draft will have the greatest career?”

We’ve been given hints that two candidates are up for selection from the polls associated with public opinion: Andy Dalton, who’s (6-4) Bengals have just recently let the AFC North division out of their grasp, and Cam Newton, whose struggling (2-8) Panthers look to have an optimistic language about their play, in spite of a bitter record. So, who’s better?


The Most Successful – Andy Dalton


In the microwave sports reality that ESPN has furnished thanks to watered down shows like “First Take” and “Tony Romo is Burning,” we are led to believe that Andy Dalton must be the quarterback with the brightest future because he has had the quickest response to the roles associated with being a successful quarterback. I mean, for goodness sake, the kid took a (4-12) team to the top of the division they share with the Ravens and the Steelers at (6-2) in week 8. He came into a fractured organization that had been plagued with ‘iffy’ decision-making for years, as the guy necessary to replace the star-quarterback who was still in town, however, would’ve rather retire than play for the team.

Well, all of the reasons I just mentions AND the fact that, regardless what you think of him now, a good majority of sports fans really didn’t want Cam Newton to succeed at one point. If he hadn’t been so endearing in the way he changed the morale of the Panther offense, people would’ve been delighted by now that someone other than Cam Newton would be the more viable candidate for ‘Rookie of the Year.’ Flash-forward 6 months and you can’t resist delight in the guy’s touchdown celebrations. But, back to Dalton…

On the year, Opie has a 59.3 completion percentage with over 2,200 yards and 15 touchdowns to 12 interceptions. With that, the Cincinnati Bengals stand at a solid (6-4) with 3rd place in a tough division. Maybe that isn’t the grandest stat of a quarterback ever, but all this is coming off a season in which Chad Ochocinco bailed for a chance at a ring with the Patriots. Meanwhile, arguably the most underrated quarterback of the modern era, vowed to retire early rather than wear the uniform again. Oh yeah…and he’s a rookie. He’s a rookie that has turned his team completely around from their former selves. The Bengals finished last season at a despicable (4-12) and this season they were, and are, actively competitive in the division with a 1½ game trail behind the Steelers and Ravens. But, Dalton hasn’t been this successful, relatively speaking, without a little help from the players around him. The wide-receiver tandem-of-the-future was brought to Cincinnati in the rookie talents of A.J. Green and the maturing athlete with the skeletons in his closet, Jerome Simpson (AND he’s a local). Together, the two have combined for 75 completions, 1197 yards, and 8 touchdowns on the season. With assistance from solid Tight End and Running Back positions, the Bengals really aren’t that bad this year. Funny, the team Colin Cowherd constantly suggested has the clumsiest possibility at success this year, really isn’t that bad. (But, be honest, Colin Cowherd wasn’t the only one) So, as he stands, Andy Dalton’s future does look bright. But, I would be willing to guess that it will be as bright as the team exists around him can be.

In other words, between the two of them, Andy Dalton brings less to his team than the affectionately despised Cam Newton. Which brings me to my next point…


The Most Valuable Player – Cam Newton


What can be worse than a 2-14 season, finishing at the bottom of the pack of professional football teams after playing in a Superbowl less than a decade prior? Having just as many wins in the win column as the previous year with only 6 more chances to improve the record, (2-8)? I would beg to differ. Have you seen the Panthers play recently? The team that got two wins last year (both of which came against NFC West opponents and one taking place after a BYE week) is the same team that has been competing aggressively with a revamped team…style…culture altogether. Yeah, these guys are (2-8), but of their 8 loses, five came down to a touchdown or less (one of which was against the undefeated Superbowl Champion, Green Bay Packers). Last season they were outscored 196-408. This season, 225-286. That really provides empirical evidence that something is different about this team. And the circumstantial change that has taken place could be credited to a single person, however, is it that single person credited if he inspires a change in the whole team?

Truly, Cam Newton is only responsible for how he plays the game of football. But let’s be real. When was the last time Steve Smith was considered a top-5 receiver with complete conviction? In the last 2 seasons, Steve Smith hasn’t been able to break the 1,000 yard mark, something we all thought would be a common occurrence after the 2008 season. This year, a little more than half the season is gone and he’s only 8 yards shy of the mark. Not only that, but Smith is also on pace to reach 1,563 yards in a season; a career best he set in 2005. Along with that, DeAngelo Williams seems to be making modest improvements towards the athlete he used to be. With the running back tandem of the once upon a time Stewart-Williams and a couple positions filled on both lines, this Panther team could be a serious contender for the NFC Championship.

Now, let’s talk some Newton -The guy we all thought had a few rough spots around the edges coming into the NFL Draft. Whether it was because he stole and destroyed his roommates laptop at Florida, or because he couldn’t name a single play he’d run at Auburn for John Gruden, a little part of us all wanted this guy to fail. But he hasn’t. In fact, I’ll be the first to admit… His success has been extremely endearing. He electrifies the Panther offense in a way that is visible on the field and in the stands. Newton has rushed for 9 Touchdowns this season, and, if you haven’t seen one yet, the celebrations really do make you happy for the guy. Not only that, but along with 411 rushing yards and 9 rushing touchdowns, his work as a passer isn’t so bad. In fact, 219 completions, 2,885 yards and 12 touchdowns is pretty good for a Rook’. On the other hand, 14 interceptions and 3 fumbles ain’t winning many championships. It’s okay, he has a great prospect for the future, let’s not forget how many issues he had in the preseason. One at a time, please.


Alright, so these must be the two Quarterbacks that will lead the most successful careers in the coming years?


“Not so fast”

-Lee Corso

The Dark Horse – Jake Locker

In fairness, I will do what I can to reveal to you that I am not a hypocrite. (I’m citing the “microwave sports reality” created by ESPN from earlier) Scout’s honor, I have had several conversations about my expectations for Jake Locker, prior to his success Sunday night. I am, unashamedly, a Seattle Seahawks fan. And before the 2011 NFL Draft, I was desperate for the fumblin’ bumbling’ Seahawks front-office to trade up in an effort to get Jake Locker because a lot of things about this guy led me to believe he will be the real deal in the future.

Let’s be honest on two points.

Point #1 -Which of the quarterbacks in the 2011 NFL Draft were the most consistent from the beginning to the end of their college career?

…Catching on?...

Point #2 –Despite how you feel about the man personally, was Brett Favre not one of the greatest quarterbacks of all time, not just his era?

Jake Locker’s career at Washington was as successful a quarterback’s career can be at the failing football program. Every year, since the first time he threw a ball too high after scoring a touchdown, which costs him the game, we heard about the talent in Seattle that was going to be a professional commodity. Before Andrew Luck was Andrew Luck, scouts were desperate to see this guy come out after his Junior season, to which he decided to return to his Alma Mater and struggle through another season. That’s a lot tougher to do when your chances at a national title aren’t as feasible as Standford’s were this year. No, the Huskies finished at 7-6 and remained outside the Top-25 all season.

It was that attribute in Locker that looked so appetizing and leads me to my next point. There’s a place where talent meets personal love of the game, and that place is sincerely beautiful…

Just look at Brett Favre’s career. I challenge anyone that payed the slightest bit of attention to professional football between 2005 and 2010, to suggest that Brett Favre doesn’t love the game. Not only do Brett Favre and Jake Locker have that in common, though.

Many would suggest the two’s playing style is uniquely similar, as well (if that makes any sense). For nearly two decades, Brett Favre relied on his quick feet and his cannon of an arm to put passes where they needed to be for the Green Bay Packers, New York Jets, Minnesota Vikings, and, with more time, the Atlanta Falcons to begin his career. There is something to be said for quarterbacks like Brett Favre; those that have a unique ability to create as the pocket is breaking down…to be able to have collapsed protection and, through sheer intuition, be able to avoid the sack and hurl it 40 yards downfield for a wide open receiver. Well, many would argue Jake Locker has that ability. He was duly noted for it as NFL drafts revealed themselves on the horizon to ESPN analysts in 2010 and 2011. But more remains to be seen from the young Locker.

Ironic how at the end of last football season, I envisioned a Seattle Seahawks team, led by the veteran Matt Hasselbeck with an Aaron Rogers-esque QB-in-waiting like Jake Locker. Over the coming years, I imagined Hasselbeck, who learned from Favre, to teach this young talent with qualities of Favre, how to be a great NFL quarterback, like Favre (Shwew!). Funny how that scenario took place, only not for my team…

But last Sunday, it happened…Hasselbeck went down with a short-lasting injury while losing to the Falcons 23-3 in the third quarter. With about 3 minutes to play in the third quarter, Jake Locker ran onto the field for Matt Hasselbeck who had accumulated 124 yards and an interception in 3 and a half quarters of play. When Locker took the field, he looked like a seasoned veteran with the skill set to win the game. From there, he threw for 140 yards and 2 touchdowns to come up just short of the falcons 17-23. Not bad for your first game, kid. Not bad.

Of course, more remains to be seen from these doe-eyed leather slingers. Who knows what will happen to the quarterback class of 2011. Superbowls? MVPs? Do I dare mention, Hall of Fame? We will have to conference again after a lengthy period of time, when all the dust has settled on their career milestones. But…I have to say… With the utmost accountability and resistance from hypocrisy as possible…

I’m takin’ Locker…

Tuesday, November 22, 2011

An Open Letter to Jimbo Fisher

Dear Jimbo,

Thank you for taking over as Offensive Coordinator after Jeff Bowden resigned/was paid off/was fired despite his father trying to save him. Thank you for providing a new vision for our program and developing quarterbacks, making them more efficient, and creating a multiple style offense that we had not seen in over a decade. I remember where I was on the day Jeff was fired, I was driving north on 319 crossing Killarney Way, and I had an old flip phone that I was typing texts on as fast as I could. Since then I have had a picture of you in a frame with the Obama-style color scheme and "Hope" written underneath. It took me a while to find a good version, but I printed it out and now it sits behind my desk just conspicuous enough so a visitor to my classroom would know I am a diehard Nole fan who really trusts his head coach.

You have brought a brand new "Process" to FSU. It is one we did not have before, nor did we really need it prior to the Lost Decade. College football has changed drastically, and it is now a business unlike anything before. I could speak and breakdown for days the relationship between recruiting, NFL style offenses, preparing players for the NFL, and the lifeblood of a program being the athletes it gets. The relationship between all of those is directly related to the changing dynamic of professional sports and collegiate revenue sports. Your process is perfect fit for our program. You understand the changing of the game and what needs to be done to get the recruits and make them great players.

However, your Process is failing. As a former student-athlete, alum, an educator, and a coach I have perspective as to what it means to mentor student-athletes and it pains me to see my University failing in a manner that can be avoided. Here are some suggestions as to what should/could be changed and why it has to take place. Stop the coach speak; evaluate the necessary changes in your Process; learn how to adjust game plans on the fly; delegate.

First, Coach, stop the coach speak. I know the relationship between the program and the media is something you want to control, but nothing is more frustrating when the very people who support your program want to find a reason to continue to support it and all they hear is a coach who explains away the results as a "lack of execution". You do realize we crucified the previous staff for blaming players? Please stop doing that. Not only is it unhelpful, it is condescending. Surely, very few of the fans understand the schemes you are explaining, so maybe your hope is to overwhelm them with X's and O's and that will satisfy them. Or maybe that is just how you think, and that is ok... if you are an Offensive Coordinator. I expect the impersonal, condescending explanations from Charlie Weiss, not Jimbo Fisher. In no way am I asking for his return, but you do realize Bowden was able to stay as long as he did because he knew how to work a room; he knew how to talk to reporters, give them good quotes, tell a story, not be an X's and O's robot? The people who pay your salary don't want to hear that you drew up a good play and the players failed to execute it.

Second, clearly your Process has progressed the recruiting beyond what it was before you got here. We will be very, very talented. It has left some gaps in the offensive line, and that will have to be answered for. But your Process on the fied is not yielding results. Something is breaking down between the drawing up of the plays and the execution of them on the field. Something needs to change in how that is being implemented.

As stated before, I am an educator. Last chapter, I provided my students with written notes, a PowerPoint form of those notes, and a conceptualized form of the information through concept charts and idea mapping using Prezi. I nailed the drawing up of the information from every possible way a student could learn. They bombed the test. The next chapter, we read the chapter together instead of on their own, we reviewed vocab twice, not once, and I gave one set of notes in one linear written form. They aced their test. The tests were equal in difficulty, but the process to get there was far less convoluted. The first process looked good to other teachers, administrators, and parents but it failed my students. My point: simplify what is taking place.

Simplify what you require. These are 19 year olds who most likely are not the best and brightest in the classroom. They have a lot going on in their lives. You must change what you are doing as a teacher of football because the same mistakes are taking place in the run blocking and the play checking at the line of scrimmage.

Changing your Process also entails preparing yourself for in game adjustments. That sounds like an oxymoron, but you have to be prepared to change on the fly. You know your football well, and you understand what other coaches do as evidenced by your decision to call for a run at the end of the game knowing they'd blitz and hoping EJ would check to a bubble. It was a great piece of chess, but that didn't happen. Too often these types of things are happening (or not happening). They are related to the above issues, but your response is key. I know you prepare every week for 1:30, 1:20, :50 on the clock, but that preparation is coming across more like shackles to what you can do. We are limited in our play calling by being unimaginative and predictable. Surely execution should take place, but it's not. Adjust, please.

Lastly, delegate your responsibilities. You are the head coach, the de facto offensive coordinator, the quarterbacks coach, the lead recruiter, the only person who gives press conferences, luncheons, interviews, or call in shows. Further, you are a father and husband. How is there that much time in the day? You have to be skimping on something. You cannot possibly have that much energy or ability to prepare everything you should. It is obvious that you are a great father and husband. You are not cutting corners in that department. My guess it is in the coaching somewhere. In fact, I am certain of it. Manuel has not developed the way he should after having four years in the program. The offensive game plan, while effective in many ways is lost when we have a single disruption (running backs missing blocks). Honestly, 1st and Goal from the 1 and we don't score a touchdown. Explain that all you want about how the DEs and OLBs were going to pinch, but that is not an excuse.

Further, you need to let your Assistant Coaches speak. If anything, this will prevent the unnecessary awkward predicament the players find themselves trying to explain what happened on the field. In a strange twist you have your players doing the PR for you and your staff rather than the adults leading the team in the most important off field aspect of the program- media/public relations. And if you will not let your coaches speak to the media, is that not a great representation of the environment and intrinsic lack of confidence you have in your subordinates? Surely you are trying to avoid a PR disaster that can happen when an assistant may contradict you, or you are letting them game plan more. It seems like a good thing that they do not have to worry about that aspect of the program. But damn, man, you in making them invisible to the larger audience of fans thus painting a larger target on your back.

These suggestions are easily dismissed because you are a major college football head coach and I am not. We don't know what happens with you and your staff, and that's exactly the point. You have challenged players and fans to commit to the program, to live up to expectations, to literally buy into it being our time but you do not answer to anyone but yourself. We trust you and want you to win. We want this program to be good, but it is difficult to trust you when you don't trust your staff, the media, or the fans. We trust you with 2.75 million dollars a year but it's hard to continue the trust when you have the program held hostage.

More control from you over this program won't fix the situation. Doing the same thing over and over again getting the same result while expecting different is not Process, it's insanity. You need to back off some of that intensity. You need to teach simpler. You need endear the fans to you. Look at the guy on top. He may not be able to draw up X's and O's, but he trusts his staff, and his players play for him because he isn't an overbearing bore. Fans have learned to trust him; they had process and he wasn't, but he is winning. He may very well hold the job you consider your dream job and he is kicking ass.


We need you to be great. We trust you to be great. You don't have to win the National Title next year. You just need to show that the same mistakes aren't being made, that your players are progressing, they we are relevant in the national picture, and that you can enjoy being head coach as well as enjoy being our coach.... oh and beat that Ag-school south on I-75.


Roll Tribe,

Mitch