Monday, December 12, 2011

Unpacking Boardwalk Empire's Finale

Reader beware: this post does not reveal all spoilers from last night's episode, but it will contain a few for the sake of analysis and general "holy shit-ness".

Earlier, I reviewed Boardwalk Empire and said I did not like the show because it did not have a likeable character who was defined by the general idea of the hero. There was no one to pull for because each person had some duplicitous dark side that ruined his or her life. Also, they stayed stuck in their situation with no effort to leave (if they thought their situation was bad and needed leaving). I hate it when people play victim when they have the power to stop being victimized. Lastly, I did not like the show because of the actual production. It looked overly stylized in an effort to look authentic. Each scene was composed with deep gravitas, and the weight of the show created a heavy and unsettling effect.

I skipped two shows mid season and caught back up to see the last three. It was a great move because the last three addressed my last two complaints. They were wonderfully produced, acted, and the story progressed. Yes, finally, the payoff after two months of set ups. However, no character was developed to be the good center, the moral center, the hero, the righteous. The lack of moral center is both an indictment on the characters in the show, reflection of the culture (past and present), and a lament that maybe this is all that exists in this life.

The last few years in Hollywood, the best films have featured terrible villains, and those villains have afforded the actors that played them Oscar gold. Daniel Day Lewis, Javier Bardem, and Health Ledger come to mind. It is clear that we respond viscerally and empathically to the presence of evil. And when evil runs amuck on screen, taking it's action to their logical conclusion, we cringe, we gasp, we peer through our slightly opened fingers. I think this is similar to the reaction of watching horror films. We know it will be ugly, but we watch with disbelief anyways.

HBO harkens itself as not being TV. They want to provide high quality story telling equivalent to movies but through hour long dramas that run half the length of a regular television season. Each season acts like a mini-series of sorts. And each series is utterly predictable in its set up. AMC has jumped on this bad wagon, too.

The Sopranos, The Wire, Mad Men, Breaking Bad, and Boardwalk Empire all are critically acclaimed shows about fatally flawed individuals who cannot escape the bad that is around them or embraces the bad that is around them while trying to maintain a life of credibility to the world at large. Last night's Boardwalk Empire built up as the first and concluded as the last.

Bravo for the story tellers (writers, director) to lead us all to think one thing was happening while simultaneously hinting at another all together without us necessarily catching on. Then whammy, Jimmy gets shot in the head.

To recap the whole season and threads that leads to this moment would take tens of thousands of words, but rather I will focus on the statement that HBO and the story tellers are making with their choice to take Knucky Thompson back to the top through manipulation, lawlessness, deceit, and violence.

Thompson begged Margaret to mary him because he loved her and needed her to be immune from testifying. He turned over a new leaf. He told her he did not believe in God despite being raised a Catholic, but he said his love has to come from God because it could not necessarily come from anywhere else and he does not have to participate in the church's traditions for that to be true. It is unclear if he loves Margaret and her children because his marriage to her seemed to only benefit him legally and economically.

Jimmy calls Knucky to talk about the shooting at Knucky. Thompson goes and talks with Jimmy and appears to have moments of emotion like he has never had with "James". He is empathetic to Jimmy's life, his misfortunes, and what propelled to the path of corruption and destruction he was on. In return for his ear and his show of empathy and possibly forgiveness, Jimmy agrees to take care of some business for Knucky regarding his trial.

Everything falls into place for Knucky to be let off of trial through a murder disguised as a suicide, Margaret not being compelled to testify, and a plea bargain gone badly for the dopey former interim sheriff. Knucky got a new lease on life and with the opportunity to make things right with the people he once loved/was in business with (they are the same thing to Knucky and both are conditional), he orchestrated a meeting where he killed Jimmy proclaiming, "I am not interested in forgiveness."

Knucky's first murder was of his surrogate son. But as with Knucky, he has no emotion for anyone else, but only his own well being. He masks every interaction with concern for the other party involved, but only looks out for himself. Through the triumph of his character, all other forms of belief have been murdered through the self interest of man.

Boardwalk Empire no longer has the favorite character of many viewers. Jimmy was the favorite because he was young, handsome, and had some glimmer of hope. We believed he was a product of his bad life experiences, and he had an attempt to make it right after violently losing his wife and father and coming to grips with the sickening and manipulative relationship with his mother. That hope he gave was one that carried the show since it had not moral ground or center. It is a pluralistic show based on pluralistic ideas of what makes life worth living or rather makes life bearable to live. Snuffing out Jimmy confirms that the evil Knucky personifies is no longer feigned emotional concern or selfish ambition, it is outright unchecked evil.

In a way, Knucky became a sympathetic figure because he was taken down by traitors, both family and friends. He was just trying to make a buck and his callousness to others was a product of his own childhood. Now, Knucky no longer has justification. He is merely a two faced person who will manipulate and kill for his desire to be in control. Religion, moral code, family loyalty, friendship, or simply socially agreed upon virtues like forgiveness no longer hold any weight in his world.

I find it hard to continue to watch the show (I'll get the better part of a year to make a decision because of how much time between seasons HBO takes) because the loss of the good. I appreciate the story tellers' discussion of corruption, personal relationship, and delineations between what is good and bad. Yet, I long for someone to be a bastion of hope or good. Someone or something to believe in... not for me personally to believe in, but someone on the show to believe in that maybe these crazy messed up people won't continue to booze, kill, philander, and kill. In a certain way, HBO has killed the show. There is no possible positive arch. The characters will continue to devolve in a spiral of self inflicted misery.

We all love the stories of the mafia because it juxtaposes good and bad, the personal and the business, loyalty and disloyalty. But those are contingent on good actually existing or being possible to exist. These are tragedies because tragedies are not good. But I am not sure Boardwalk Empire is a tragedy in that sense. I think it is a lament that no one is good and anyone who is good will be seduced to be bad. They cannot avoid it or escape it. That is a difficult conclusion to come to. If that is life, then I, at least, do not want to watch a show about it.

I am not advocating we make all shows happy or positive. I am merely saying Boardwalk Empire made a fatal mistake in killing off a popular character. Also, I think this is a reflection of our society and the despondence many feel regarding relativistic thought and the lack of any sort of absolute reason for living. When we make our own reasons, they are often corrupt and unable to stay, in any way, good.

Thursday, December 8, 2011

The Sports Party: Episode 031

Today on the podcast, Dan and I discuss if the Big East moves make any difference to the fledgling conference. Next we discuss the Heisman candidates and pick our own Heisman winners.



Make sure you follow this link to join the Sports Party Bowl Game Challenge. The password is party2011.

Thanks for your continued support of the Sports Party. Here is the link to download the podcast from iTunes. Email us at thesportsparty@gmail.com.

Tuesday, December 6, 2011

The Sports Party: Episode 030

First off follow this link to join the Sports Party Bowl Mania page and pick the winners of the bowl games. If you win there might be actual prizes, ACTUAL PRIZES! Alright now on to the podcast, first Dan, Mitch and I discuss the ACC Championship game. Next we stick with the ACC and discuss if Virginia Tech and Michigan deserve to be in the Sugar Bowl. We then try to decide if Alabama deserves to play in the National Championship. Enjoy the podcast.



Thanks for your continued support of the Sports Party. Here is the link to download the podcast from iTunes. Email us at thesportsparty@gmail.com.

Monday, December 5, 2011

In Defense of the Bowls

Division 1 Bowl Subdivision is the only division in any NCAA sport that does not determine their National Champion by a playoff. Many hate this. Many think that the way the sport is decided is unfair, biased to a region or institution, or simply inadequate. All these arguments are fair and have merit. However, I would like to spin another angle that may change the minds of those people who hate the bowl system.

From the dawn of college football... ok, so I don't know if it is that long ago, but from early CFB to now the sport has been incredibly popular. It was far more popular than any professional football until the 1970's. So the powers of the institutions and the powers of warm weather cities decided that the teams could match up in post season exhibitions that would not be seen elsewhere on conference and regional schedules.

It was a win-win-win. The cities got a unique matchup that brought dollars to their area. The insitutions got a lot of money for attending. The players got treated to vacations, the best lodging, media attention, and free goods and services. Further, it exposed them to new areas around the country and new media outlets where they could show off their talents. In short, the amateur players, for one week a year while not attending classes were treated like professional athletes.

That's exactly right. During the height of "amateurism" the powers that be decided it was completely acceptable for the collegiate football players to be treated as professionals. The bowl gift packages have to players have monetary limit, but the week does not. Hotels, resorts, tourism, free food, free clothes, free travel are all included.

Often, the BCS is eviscerated because the head of the BCS says the Bowl system is a reward for the players. The presidents of the universities have not voted for a playoff because it is widely understood that the bowls produce so much money for the schools that a playoff would take away that money from those who currently get it and place it in the hands of the NCAA.

Both are true and valid arguments. Yes, these players who work their asses off all year (some in the classroom, too), many who are not paid bags of cash like a recent Heisman Trophy winner, get a chance to live a life of ease at the end of their year. In fact, these players don't belong to major college football programs either. How many times have we looked at lesser tier bowls and the teams playing in them and think, "wow, this bowl is terrible" or "holy crap, why are these teams in a bowl game?... and why is it played in Shreveport, St Petersburg, or El Paso?"

Because the money is so great. Presidents of big time colleges take a gamble and pump money into programs in hopes of big TV dollars and big bowl payouts. Small time programs most likely lose money, but because of the bowl system they can get an influx of cash at the end of the year, it's pooled and shared among conference members, and then given to universities.

I am not arguing that the BCS is not a flawed system. Nor am I arguing that these programs make an incredible amount of money on 18-22 year olds in a system that has no market competitor. But I am saying that the Bowl system allows football players, many who will never ever sniff the NFL, a chance to be rewarded through gifts and cash equivalents.

Yes, the BCS is bad. The system before it was worse. But a playoff would very likely undermine a system that allows for what we call for all the time: college football players to receive compensation.


Sunday, December 4, 2011

The Thrill of the Hunt:

UNC's Search for a New Head Coach
Throughout the past two football seasons, the NCAA probe into the UNC football program has left the university in an awkward position with an unusual set of circumstances. Not since Lawrence Taylor, has UNC’s legitimacy come under such scrutiny. From the playing fields to the classroom, UNC has always been viewed as a top-tier school even by the highest standards. People in the UNC family were immediately baffled by the allegations of misconduct by the University’s Athletic Department. While outsiders may throw ignorant suggestions about the quality of management in the UNC tradition by grasping at unfamiliar straws, the University is quietly handling any ill-advised student-athlete transactions with precaution to disguise the scandal as what it is: uniquely isolated. While the administration deals with remedying the scandal, the ‘mismanaged’ athletic department looks forward to another basketball season atop many lists to win another national championship, while the football program continues to heal.
The UNC football season began in a depressive manner; with 3 weeks left in the preseason, UNC was in the process of appointing Everett Withers to lead the football team just hours after showing Butch Davis the door. Altogether, the football team put together a successful season with a (5-1) start and a +.500 record to regain bowl eligibility in what could have been ‘the most broken season’ for UNC athletics. This positive rebound from the fall-out that began in July 2010 most surely earned Everett Withers an interview for the Head Coaching job left vacant by Davis in the preseason. It cannot be overemphasized how well Withers handled the situation in which he was presented. His success was positively viewed by the revamped UNC Athletic Department and Coach Withers has most deservedly been nominated as a candidate for the unclaimed Head Coaching position. So, what competition does he face for the job?
Thanks to the constant monitoring of insidecarolina.com, as well as several other sources, the list of candidates that follow represent the pool of nominees UNC is interviewing for the HC position: Everett Withers, Larry Fedora, Butch Jones, James Franklin, Kevin Sumlin, and Gus Malzahn. Per insidecarolina.com, because Urban Meyer is the new hire at Ohio State, hesitation for Skip Holtz’s inclusion in the list of candidates, and Chris Petersen’s romantic affinity for Idaho, these three coaches, who were at one time considered to be potential candidates, are all off the board. Did you really think Urban Meyer would give up UF dominance established by himself for a 3-star project like UNC football? So, other than Meyer, which of these candidates is the best option to take control of the UNC football program?

Let’s break these guys down based on what they could bring to UNC football and what they might be lacking.

Everett Withers
Pros:
-He has worked as a defensive coach on the professional and collegiate level.
-From 2002-2004, as the Tennessee Titans’ DB coach, Withers gained notoriety by leading the Titans defense to 57 interceptions over 3 seasons (the most interceptions by a team in a three year span since 1993-1995).
- In 2009, Withers turned the UNC defense into a powerhouse defense in the NCAA
-2009 UNC defense: 6th in total defense, 13th in scoring defense, 10th in run defense, 14th in pass defense.
-The only school in the country ranking in the top-15 in total yards allowed, scoring defense, run defense, pass defense, third-down defense, tackles for loss, and pass efficiency.
-(7-5) record with the Tarheels in his year as interim head coach.
Cons:
- Everett Withers has had little experience in the role as head coach and although he managed the pressure this season in an outstanding way, UNC is looking for a coach that has a record of success.
-Butch Davis left an impact on UNC football that has fans expecting the program to keep improving.
-Davis made 4 and 5-star prospects a normalcy at UNC. Since his departure, Withers has struggled on the recruiting trail and talent has dropped off over the year from potential 5 stars to a majority of 3 star athletes.
-Mediocrity is not what Bubba Cunningham is looking for in his first hire as the new AD.
-The most crucial element that Withers is unable to avoid is his tie to the Davis era scandal.
-UNC has to make a decision to bury this blemish on the University and a Head Coach tenured through the scandal doesn’t help separating the university from the past.
-(3-5) conference record falling to the bottom of the ACC Coastal Division
Decision: Withers isn’t our guy. UNC is looking to make a splash with whom they bring in to take the reigns of a growing football program. There is money in the boosters club dedicated to bringing in a proven success
and, while Withers did a fantastic job leading the football team through a tough year, his credentials don’t yell improvement, and the university and he share too much history associated with the Butch Davis fallout. Nonetheless, we wish him a future full of success. Thank you, Coach Withers.

Kevin Sumlin
Pros:
-Sumlin has had concrete success as a Division 1 NCAA head coach.
-Since taking over at Houston in 2008, Sumlin has accrued a (35-17) record and, in 2011, led Houston to an undefeated regular season and a potential BCS bowl berth (Note: After losing to Southern Miss. on Sat. Dec. 3, Sumlin's Cougar's came just shy of a (13-0 record) and Conference USA championship, thus forfeiting a shot at a BCS bowl berth.).
-Brought Houston into the Top-25 in week 7 and remained there throughout the season reaching 6th overall at the end of the regular season.
-Has had success in recruiting and offense
- The Cougar offense has topped 40 points in 22 of 39 game (56.4%), reached 50 points nine times and scored over 70 points twice.
- Receiving the OC job midseason at Texas A&M, Sumlin took the offense from 16 ppg to 33 ppg, immediately.
-Ties to Bubba Cunningham
- Fits the mold of what Cunningham wants for the new HC with a highlighted offense.
- Coached against and beat Cunningham’s former school, Tulsa, on every occasion Cunningham was there.
Cons:
-His newfound success has him high on coaching lists around the country.
-As the new Athletic Director, Cunningham should be hasty on making the right decision regarding a new head coach. Sumlin’s success will put him in the driver’s seat for head coaching opportunities next year, and that could mean UNC would be waiting a long time in a Sumlin-or-bust pursuit. With that said, Sumlin could be off the board earlier rather than later. Arizona State has already offered Sumlin their head-coaching job, and with his recent success, other schools are likely to pull the same trigger soon.
-BCS success
-Though Sumlin has had an outstanding record at Houston, you always have to be slightly skeptical when pulling a coach up from the lower-than-BCS ranks. The ACC is no football powerhouse, but the competition will stiffen up on a week-to-week basis. There’s a reason they haven’t let Boise play for a championship yet.

Decision: Coach Sumlin would be the hire that would define the beginning of Bubba Cunningham’s tenure at UNC and reignite the fading flame of optimism in the Tarheel faithful. It’s an all around improvement in both X’s/O’s strategy and the recruiting weakness of Withers. Additionally, the Tarheels stout young offense coming back next year could be appropriate tools for Sumlin to work with. There’s no realistic projection of how Sumlin would contend in a BCS conference, but there’s no reason to believe he doesn’t deserve the shot.

Gus Malzahn
Pros:
-Offensive mastermind
- Gained recognition through redeveloping and re-popularizing the Wildcat formation, which he has used as the OC at Arkansas, Tulsa, and Auburn.
-Malzahn has created an effective offensive style, which operates as a no-huddle spread-oriented run first and pass attack.
-Success as an offensive coordinator
-While at Auburn, Malzahn ran one of the most proficient SEC offenses to the effect of a national championship title
-His offenses in 2007 and 2008 ranked first nationally in total offense
-2010 Frank Broyles Award recipient, top assistant coach in the country.
-Great Recruiter
Cons:
-Inexperience
-Just 6 years removed from being an Arkansas high school head coach, Malzahn has quickly worked his way up the ranks from an offensive coordinating novelty to a commodity as head coach. Only thing is, he’s yet to coach a game on the collegiate level as an HC.
-Character Flaws
-‘Flaws’ is a little too harsh. Malzahn has an unusual personality, but that’s not worth noting. His wife however has shown up in the media from time to time and rumors about her personal behavior seem to follow the pair.

Decision: UNC’s current offensive style may not be the perfect fit for Malzahn to work with, but he is completely capable of re-engineering and transforming the UNC football program into a successful ACC program. This does seem to be the perfect hire for Cunningham now that Petersen in falling on the list. Malzahn’s name would bring a Petersen-style splash. His reputation as an offensive ‘genius’ would bring the same optimism about the program that the Butch Davis hire had—perhaps more. Carolina may not have the exact personnel Malzahn would want, but they have nearly all the pieces for him to work with. While this is my personal favorite for the position, I hate the idea of watching UNC’s defense play second-fiddle to a non-Pro style offense. Malzahn should be at the top of Cunningham’s list

Conclusion
Everett Withers and Gus Malzahn met with Bubba Cunningham Nov. 29 and Dec. 1 respectivel to interview for the Head Coaching position. In the upcoming week, Kevin Sumlin, along with Southern Mississippi Head Coach Larry Fedora, Vanderbilt Head Coach James Franklin, USF Head Coach Skip Holtz, and Cincinnati Head Coach Butch Jones, will interview for the position, as well. At the present time, Malzahn and Sumlin top the list for apparent reasons—Everett Withers stands in the second tier, due his own consideration—Fedora, Jones, and Franklin round out the list, with Holtz status wavering as a potential hire. Cunningham has officially stated that UNC will know their new Head Coach by UNC’s bowl game, which is projected to either be the Independence Bowl on Dec. 26 or the Military Bowl on Dec. 28. Either way, UNC fans should have an idea of the direction the program is heading by Christmas.


UPDATE: As of Dec. 5, UNC has officially offered USM head coach Larry Fedora the head coaching position at UNC. Through 4 season in Hattiesburg, Fedora is (33-19). He is expected to accept the position Tuesday Dec. 6.

Friday, December 2, 2011

Let's Blow Some Money (Working Title)

Everyone likes to gamble, whether it's paying five dollars to get in a March Madness bracket pool, playing poker for quarters and dimes in a friend's basement or actually going to Vegas. My favorite way to gamble is on sports. It's a subject I feel pretty confident in so why not put my (very little) money, where my mouth is. Every Friday I am going to bring you the best betting lines from the weekend and what I think you should do. I am not going to do cheesy locks of the weeks or anything like that, I am just bring you solid games to bet on.

The team in bold is who you should bet on.

Friday

NCAAB

Florida Gators
Syracuse Orange (-6)

There are two key factors in taking the Orange to beat the spread this weekend, one, they are playing this game at home and two, the zone play of Syracuse. The Florida Gators come into this season kind of a question mark to me and outside of their early game against Ohio State the level of competition has been low. Syracuse hasn't played anyone to the level of talent of Ohio State but I think we know what we are getting out of Syracuse with so many returning players and Jim Boeheim's commitment to the zone. From what I have seen from Syracuse so far I am confident they will beat the spread. 

NCAAF

Oregon Ducks
UCLA Bruins (+31)

If you are new to gambling I am going to explain something to you right here. That (+31) means that Oregon is picked to beat UCLA by 31 points right now. If you think that it will be less than that and you would take UCLA at (+31). If you think Oregon beats UCLA by more than 31 points you take Oregon at (-31). That's a pretty easy way of explaining that. In this game I am going to take UCLA to cover the spread and not get beat by more than 31 points. I know Oregon is the better team, they are playing at home and a win gives them a BCS bowl bid and they will win this game. But I expect UCLA to show up at this game with some passion and not get blown out by the Ducks. The head coach, Rick Neuheisel, was fired earlier this week and his players carried him off the practice field in their last practice before traveling up to Eugene. I expect this team to show up for their coach and for the opportunity of playing in the first ever Pac12 Championship game. The Bruins will cover the spread.

Sunday

NFL

Buffalo Bills (-3)
Tennessee Titans

Buffalo has been on a four game slid but last week showed up and played the New York Jets well but ultimately lost 28-24. The Titans have gone win, loss, win, loss, win over their last five games and I would expect another loss this weekend despite the Bills five game losing streak. In the two loses the Titans have lost by 13 total points. They keep games close but I expect Buffalo to get the win this weekend and cover the three points. 

Atlanta Falcons (-3)
Houston Texans

The Houston Texans are riding high on a five game winning streak but everything is not so great down in Houston. Two weeks ago they lost their starting quarterback, Matt Schaub, to a foot injury. Last weekend they lost their backup quarterback, Matt Leinart, to a shoulder injury and both Schaub and Leinart are out for the season. So the team now turns to their third-string, rookie quarterback T.J. Yates. The Texans do have a solid running game and a good defense but the Falcons will be able to drop eight guys in the box and force Yates to beat them. I don't expect that to happen. The Falcons also have a good running game and I would expect rookie mistakes by Yates to ultimately help the Falcons break this game open. I do not expect this to be close. Take the Falcons. 

Thursday, December 1, 2011

The Sports Party: Episode 029

Today on the Sports Party podcast, first I announce our first ever contest between us at the Sports Party and you. Listen and then follow the directions found here. Next Dan comes on and we discuss the ACC Championship game between Virginia Tech and Clemson. Also, we discuss Tim Tebow and his early career in the NFL. Lastly, we come back to the ACC Championship game and give our predictions. Enjoy the podcast.



Thanks for your continued support of the Sports Party. Here is the link to download the podcast from iTunes. Email us at thesportsparty@gmail.com.